On Sun., April 29 the CBS “news”
program “60 Minutes” spent a half hour marketing its
own corporation’s new book: Hard Measures: How Aggressive CIA Actions
After 9/11 Saved American Lives by former CIA operative Jose
Rodriguez.
The publisher, we find out late in
the broadcast, is CBS-owned Simon and Schuster. So, in fact, CBS subjected its some
18 million viewers to a 30-minute infomercial covering facts and government
propaganda the nation has heard since as far back as 2002.
Rodriguez, former head of the CIA’s
Clandestine Service, dramatically referred to as “the dark side”--as if to
align it with a Harry Potter fairytale--insists that George W. Bush’s Justice Department constantly assured him and
his cohorts that their “enhanced interrogation techniques” were legal. And
Leslie Stahl, the “60 Minutes” interviewer, challenges that with a tone more of
powder-puff football than investigative-reporting hardball.
For example, she doesn’t point out
this: while the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel, i.e., John Yoo,
issued a memo in 2002 classifying techniques like waterboarding as legal—the
memo was rescinded in 2004. That’s when
Yoo’s replacement in Justice read Yoo’s material and challenged the White House
on the CIA’s torture practices—actions condemned by the United Nations as
torture since 1975.
The year 2004 is also when,
according to The New York Times, the
Bush Administration began calling torture “abhorrent,” a legally savvy position
for Bush to take if he didn’t want to be tried for war crimes.
Stahl, in her interview, does point
out that the FBI disagrees with Rodriguez on the successful results of torture
in obtaining vital information. She quotes to him what the FBI told her, but
she doesn’t interview anyone on camera—from the FBI, Obama White House, accused
terrorists’ attorneys, the United Nations, the American Civil Liberties Union,
or anywhere else—to refute Rodriguez’s claims and bring balance to the
broadcast.
To bring forth voices of reasonable
opposition to Rodriguez could, of course, negatively affect the new book’s
marketability, i.e., book sales. And, please, let’s not have a news program
negatively affect the corporation’s bottom line. We learned the detrimental
effect of that in Paddy Chayefsky’s “Network,” didn’t we?
Last year, in the Peculiar Progressive column published by
the Clyde Fitch Report out of New York City, we
criticized “60 Minutes” in its one-sided report on the federal Drug Enforcement
Administration’s apprehending Victor Bout, who was accused of illegal gun sales
with intent to kill American agents. CBS News Chief Investigative Correspondent
Armen Keteyian interviewed U.S.
government sources for his story, but showed no effort to balance the story by
interviewing Bout’s American lawyer, nor did he mention any effort to interview
Bout himself. This program aired before Bout’s federal court trial, with
Keteyian basically judging him as guilty, and honoring the federal agency that
arrested him. That’s more a role, wouldn’t you say, for a government official
rather than a major TV network’s news
organization?
Both of these, Stahl’s and
Keteyian’s reports, continue a dangerous practice of basically feeding the
public one-sided stories which serve what President Dwight Eisenhower warned us
about: the rising military-industrial complex. And, let’s face it, the federal
government and the major media conglomerates now stand at the center of that.
(Peculiar
Progressive is scheduled to return to The Clyde
Fitch Report when it resumes publication after Memorial Day.)
No comments:
Post a Comment